What Is a Race Condition Vulnerability?
A race condition is a situation that happens in a computing system when two or more operations must execute in a particular sequence, but the system’s control does not enforce this order. It’s like a competition, or race, where the sequence of actions matters, and the lack of control over order leads to unexpected results.
A race condition vulnerability is a software bug that allows these unexpected results to be exploited by malicious entities. It occurs when multiple threads access and manipulate shared data concurrently, leading to unexpected and erroneous outcomes. Below is a simple example of a race condition stemming from lack of synchronization between two processes.
| Process 1 | Process 2 | Memory Value |
|---|---|---|
| Read value | 0 | |
| Flip value | 1 | |
| Read value | 1 | |
| Flip value | 0 |
A race condition can lead to an array of problems, including system crashes, incorrect outputs, and in the worst-case scenario, a security breach. The unpredictability of race conditions makes them a severe vulnerability.
Race conditions are related to business logic vulnerabilities. Like a business logic vulnerability, a race condition is a software design flaw that leads to a security vulnerability.
This is part of a series of articles about website security
The Anatomy of a Race Condition
Let’s look at some of the aspects that make up a race condition.
Critical Section
A critical section in a multithreaded program is a segment of code where a thread accesses shared variables. The critical section is the part of a program where the shared resource is accessed and often modified. When two threads access this section simultaneously, it leads to a race condition, as the operations are no longer occurring in a deterministic manner.
Lack of Synchronization
The lack of synchronization is a fundamental factor leading to race conditions. When a program does not ensure that its threads or processes operate in a well-defined order while accessing shared resources, it creates an environment ripe for race conditions.
Without proper synchronization, operations become non-atomic, meaning that instead of executing as indivisible operations, they can be interrupted or interleaved with other operations. This can lead to inconsistent states or data corruption, as different threads may read and write on shared data in an uncoordinated manner.
Unpredictable Outcome
The essence of a race condition is its unpredictability. The outcome of operations in a race condition is not deterministic because it depends on the sequence and timing of uncontrollable events. This unpredictability can manifest in various ways, such as different program runs producing different results, or even the same run behaving differently under slightly different conditions (e.g., load or timing).
This characteristic not only makes race conditions particularly hard to detect and replicate but also challenging to debug and fix. It requires comprehensive testing, often involving stress tests or concurrency tests, to uncover and address.
The Impact of a Race Condition Attack
A race condition vulnerability can lead to several types of cyber attacks.
Privilege Escalation
Privilege escalation is a type of security breach in which an attacker gains elevated access to resources that are typically protected from an application or user, leading to a higher privilege level within the application’s context. A race condition vulnerability could potentially allow an attacker to exploit the timing of actions to gain unauthorized access or privileges in a system.
Data Corruption
If multiple threads are allowed to modify a shared resource simultaneously without proper synchronization, they can overwrite each other’s modifications, leading to inconsistent and corrupt data. This could be damaging in systems that rely heavily on data integrity, such as banking or medical systems.
Denial of Service (DoS)
Race conditions can be exploited to induce a Denial of Service (DoS) attack. In such scenarios, an attacker deliberately triggers a race condition to create a deadlock or exhaust system resources, leading to service unavailability. For instance, by repeatedly invoking a race condition, an attacker might cause the system to allocate resources (like memory or file handles) without ever releasing them, eventually depleting the system’s resources and leading to service downtime.
Information Leakage
Race conditions can also lead to information leakage, where sensitive data is unintentionally exposed to unauthorized parties. This can occur if concurrent processes or threads improperly handle memory and resource allocation, causing an overlap in memory spaces or the unintended sharing of resources. Information leakage not only compromises data confidentiality but can also serve as a foothold for further, more severe attacks.
Real Life Examples of Race Condition Vulnerabilities
Wind River (CVE-2019-12263)
Wind River Systems, a provider of software for the Internet of Things (IoT), encountered a race condition vulnerability in 2019. The vulnerability, officially known as CVE-2019-12263, was found in Wind River VxWorks, a popular real-time operating system used in many embedded systems across various industries.
The flaw was a result of a race condition in the error handling mechanisms of the operating system’s IPnet TCP/IP stack. It allowed an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service. This had serious implications, given the widespread use of VxWorks in critical infrastructure systems, including industrial, medical, and aerospace applications.
The vulnerability was discovered through a routine security audit and was promptly addressed by Wind River. The company released a patch to fix the flaw and also provided guidelines on mitigating the risk associated with the vulnerability.
Juniper (CVE-2020-1667)
In 2020, Juniper Networks, a networking equipment manufacturer, was faced with a race condition vulnerability. The flaw, designated as CVE-2020-1667, was found in Juniper’s Junos OS used in its networking and security products.
The vulnerability was due to a race condition in the processing of certain types of packets. This could be exploited by an attacker to trigger a kernel crash. Given the critical role played by Juniper’s products in networking infrastructure, this vulnerability could have severe implications if exploited.
Juniper Networks took swift action to address this vulnerability. The company provided a software update that resolved the flaw and issued an advisory to its customers detailing the vulnerability and the steps required to mitigate it.
Windows OLE (CVE-2023-29325)
In 2023, Microsoft’s Windows Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) feature faced a remote code execution vulnerability. Named CVE-2023-29325, this was due to a race condition in the handling of OLE objects.
Such a vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause a system crash. Microsoft released a patch for its affected operating system versions to mitigate this vulnerability.
GpuService (CVE-2023-40131)
Another vulnerability was found in Google’s GpuService. The flaw, named CVE-2023-40131, was due to a race condition in the handling of GPU commands.
An attacker could potentially exploit this flaw to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service. This resulted in a use-after-free vulnerability, where the attacker could escalate privileges and exploit the system without the user’s involvement. Google released a unit test and patch to help mitigate this vulnerability.
How to Prevent Race Condition Flaws
Here are several measures that can be taken to help prevent race condition vulnerabilities:
Use Techniques and Tools for Syncing Threads
Synchronizing threads is an effective way to prevent race conditions. Mutexes, semaphores, and monitors are some of the traditional techniques used to synchronize threads. These techniques control access to shared resources, ensuring that only one thread can access a resource at a given time.
Modern programming languages also provide built-in support for thread synchronization. For example, Java provides the synchronized keyword, which can be used to create blocks of code that only one thread can execute at a time.
Various tools can help identify potential race conditions in your code. Static analysis tools can analyze your code without executing it, identifying potential threats such as race conditions. Dynamic analysis tools can detect race conditions during the execution of your code.
Avoid Using Shared States
One of the leading causes of race conditions is the use of shared states. Avoiding shared states can significantly reduce the risk of race conditions.
Instead of shared states, consider using message passing. In this approach, threads communicate with each other by sending and receiving messages. Since each thread has its private memory, there is no need for shared states, thereby reducing the risk of race conditions.
Another alternative is to use immutable objects. Immutable objects cannot be changed once created, eliminating the possibility of a race condition caused by simultaneous modification of shared data.
Monitor Applications for Race Conditions
Even with the best coding practices and tools in place, race conditions can still occur. Continuous monitoring can help detect these conditions in real-time, allowing you to take corrective action immediately.
Monitoring can involve various activities, such as log analysis, network traffic analysis, and system performance monitoring. These activities can help identify unusual patterns that may indicate a race condition.
Business Logic Vulnerability Prevention with Imperva
Imperva’s Web Application Firewall can prevent business logic attacks and other application layer attacks, with world-class analysis of web traffic to your applications.
Beyond WAF, Imperva provides:
Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) – Real-time attack detection and prevention from your application runtime environment goes wherever your applications go. Stop external attacks and injections and reduce your vulnerability backlog.
API Security – Automated API protection ensures your API endpoints are protected as they are published, shielding your applications from exploitation.
Advanced Bot Protection – Prevent business logic attacks from all access points – websites, mobile apps and APIs. Gain seamless visibility and control over bot traffic to stop online fraud through account takeover or competitive price scraping.
DDoS Protection – Block attack traffic at the edge to ensure business continuity with guaranteed uptime and no performance impact. Secure your on premises or cloud-based assets – whether you’re hosted in AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Public Cloud.
Attack Analytics – Ensures complete visibility with machine learning and domain expertise across the application security stack to reveal patterns in the noise and detect application attacks, enabling you to isolate and prevent attack campaigns.
Client-Side Protection – Gain visibility and control over third-party JavaScript code to reduce the risk of supply chain fraud, prevent data breaches, and client-side attacks.
